Peer Review Policy

TTEM Journal is committed to peer review integrity and upholding the highest standards of review. Once your manuscript has been assessed for suitability by the editor, it will then be double-blind peer-reviewed by at least two independent, anonymous experts in the field.

TTEM Journal The peer review process:

1. Submission of Paper

The corresponding or submitting author submits the paper to the journal. This is usually via an online system or email:

2. Editor’s Assessment

The Editor checks that the paper is appropriate for the journal and is sufficiently original and interesting. If not, the paper may be rejected without being reviewed any further. If yes Editor checks on the paper’s composition and arrangement against the journal’s Author Guidelines to make sure it includes the required sections and decide on reviewers.

3. Review process

TTEM Journal employs double blind reviewing, where both the referee and author remain anonymous throughout the process. Referees are matched to the paper according to their expertise. They can propose to accept or reject paper or else To accept with minor correction or with majör correction with another round of review.

4. Editor’s Decision is final

Referees advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. Members of the international Editorial Boards lend insight, advice and guidance to the Editor.

5. Final report

A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees.